Recently, I met a young Eritrean woman visiting Eritrea for the first time. We sat together on a calm, sunlit afternoon as she shared her impressions of the country. Having grown up abroad, she described her experience with a mixture of surprise and frustration. The surprise came from what she encountered — a place very different from what she had expected. The frustration stemmed from realizing how far that reality seemed from the picture presented to her over the years.
She had long heard about Eritrea through news reports and conversations abroad. Her parents, both Eritrean-born and long settled overseas, had often tried to explain that the country she heard about and the country they knew were not the same. Eventually, they encouraged her to visit and see for herself. Experiencing Eritrea firsthand, she found many of her assumptions quietly unraveling.
Her reaction was not unusual. Over the years, I have met many people whose understanding of Eritrea was shaped at a distance, only to be reshaped by direct experience. Preconceptions formed from afar often give way to more layered impressions once the country is encountered up close.
Our discussion soon moved beyond first impressions to a deeper question: what might an Eritrean seeing the country clearly for the first time come to value? Together, we began identifying aspects of Eritrea that inspire quiet pride — some visible immediately, others revealed through closer observation.
One of the first themes we examined was developmental progress, and how sharply it contrasts with portrayals abroad. Eritrea emerged from a devastating war of independence that left infrastructure destroyed and the economy in ruins. In the decades since, it has faced external aggression, sanctions, regional instability, and persistent economic pressures.
It also confronts structural challenges. In particular, its location in the Horn of Africa has exposed it to regional conflict that complicates development and stability.
Yet since independence in 1991, Eritrea has made steady progress across key sectors. Healthcare improvements have reduced maternal and child mortality and increased life expectancy. Education has expanded significantly, with rising enrolment and literacy, alongside policies such as mother-tongue instruction in early schooling. Infrastructure development — roads, dams, telecommunications — has strengthened national integration and economic activity. Agricultural initiatives and growing investments in renewable energy reflect a commitment to food security and sustainability.
Viewed against the backdrop of adversity, such as external aggression, unjust sanctions, and climate change, among others, these gains are remarkable. Eritrea has continued to pursue long-term development goals despite sustained pressure, demonstrating resilience and collective determination.
From visible progress, we turned to the principles guiding it. Social justice and equality quickly emerged as central themes. Development policies have consistently aimed to reduce inequality and uplift marginalized communities. Inclusive education, rural agricultural support programs, free healthcare and schooling, adult literacy initiatives, micro-credit schemes, and the elimination of harmful practices reflect a deliberate effort to expand opportunity. In a diverse society of multiple ethnic and religious communities, such measures strengthen not only development outcomes but also national cohesion.
Another defining principle is self-reliance. Eritrea engages internationally, but selectively — seeking cooperation that strengthens domestic capacity rather than fostering dependency. This philosophy is rooted in the independence struggle, which cultivated resourcefulness and collective responsibility. By prioritizing locally grounded solutions and safeguarding sovereignty, the country has sought to ensure that progress remains sustainable and nationally owned.
Whether one agrees with every policy decision or not, the consistency of this approach is difficult to ignore. It reflects a belief that dignity, equity, and independence are practical foundations for nation-building.
We also discussed corruption — a subject frequently raised in conversations about developing states. Contrary to common assumptions, many individuals and organizations with long-term experience in Eritrea describe an absence of the systemic corruption that plagues numerous administrations elsewhere. While perception-based indices often suggest otherwise, those working on the ground have frequently remarked on the lack of normalized practices such as informal payments or entrenched patronage networks. Viewed alongside the country’s emphasis on discipline, equity, and national ownership, this is a part of a broader governing ethos.
Later, as we finished our cappuccinos beneath a clear sky, our conversation turned to what may be Eritrea’s most distinctive feature: its peace and stability. In a region often marked by turbulence, the country’s prevailing calm stands in striking contrast. This stability is notable given its ethnic and religious diversity — factors that have ignited unrest in other contexts.
Eritrea’s cohesion is neither accidental nor recent. It is rooted in a long history of coexistence, strengthened during the independence struggle, and reinforced through policies that expand opportunity and promote shared identity. Universal access to education and healthcare, along with sustained efforts to reduce inequality, have helped sustain this equilibrium. Peace here is not merely the absence of conflict, but the presence of social balance and collective responsibility.
By the end of our conversation, it was clear that what she had discovered was more than a different image of Eritrea; it was a different framework for understanding development itself. Eritrea’s experience offers lessons not only for its diaspora, but for Africa and the wider Global South. It underscores the value of indigenous agency, resilience, and context-specific solutions.
In a global order where power often shapes narrative and the strong impose on the small, Eritrea’s perseverance stands as both quiet critique and living counterpoint. Its emphasis on equality, unity, and self-reliance challenges externally driven models that overlook local priorities. The road ahead remains demanding and shaped by forces beyond its control. Yet the progress achieved thus far suggests that even in an unequal world, determined people grounded in shared purpose can chart their own course toward dignity and collective advancement.
English